New data from the STAR experiment at Brookhaven National Laboratory’s Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) add detail, if not also complexity, to an intriguing puzzle that scientists have been seeking to solve: how the building blocks that make up a proton contribute to its spin.
The results, just published as a rapid communication in the journal Physical Review D, reveal definitively for the first time that different “flavors” of antiquarks contribute differently to the proton’s overall spin — and in a way that’s opposite to those flavors’ relative abundance.
“This measurement shows that the quark piece of the proton spin puzzle is made of several pieces,” said James Drachenberg, a deputy spokesperson for STAR from Abilene Christian University who received his Ph.D. in physics from Texas A&M University in 2012. “It’s not a boring puzzle; it’s not evenly divided. There’s a more complicated picture, and this result is giving us the first glimpse of what that picture looks like.”
It’s not the first time that scientists’ view of proton spin has changed. There was a full-blown spin crisis in the 1980s when an experiment at the European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN) revealed that the sum of quark and antiquark spins within a proton could account for, at best, a quarter of the overall spin.
“The spin crisis forced us fundamentally to rethink our understanding of the proton,” said physicist Carl Gagliardi, a convener of the STAR Spin Physics working group at Texas A&M. “Before that time, we thought of protons as two ‘up’ quarks and a ‘down’ quark. We knew there are also gluons present to bind the quarks together, and the theory requires additional ephemeral quark-antiquark pairs. But we thought the gluons and antiquarks played no role in the visible proton properties.”
STAR is an international collaboration of more than 500 physicists and engineers from 60 universities and national laboratories in the U.S. and 11 other countries. Texas A&M has been a STAR institution since 2000, and at present, there are nine Texas A&M Cyclotron Institute-affiliated physicists in STAR, including three faculty members.
RHIC, a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science user facility for nuclear physics research at Brookhaven, was built in part so scientists could measure the contributions of other components, including antiquarks and gluons. Antiquarks, which have only a fleeting existence, form as quark-antiquark pairs when gluons split.
“We call these pairs the quark sea,” Drachenberg said. “At any given instant, you have quarks, gluons and a sea of quark-antiquark pairs that contribute in some way to the description of the proton. We understand the role these sea quarks play in some respects, but not in respect to spin.”
Exploring flavor in the sea
One key consideration is whether different “flavors” of sea quarks contribute to spin differently. Quarks come in six of them — the up and down varieties that make up the protons and neutrons of ordinary visible matter, and four other more exotic species. Splitting gluons can produce up quark/antiquark pairs, down quark/antiquark pairs and sometimes even more exotic quark/antiquark pairs.
“There is no reason why a gluon would prefer to split into one or the other of these flavors,” said Ernst Sichtermann, a STAR collaborator from DOE’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) who played a lead role in the sea quark research. “We’d expect equal numbers [of up and down pairs], but that’s not what we are seeing.”
Gagliardi notes that Texas A&M physicists played a major role in an experiment 20 years ago at DOE’s Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory that found the proton contains more down antiquarks than up antiquarks. Moreover, Texas A&M physics graduate student Eric Hawker won the 1999 American Physical Society Division of Nuclear Physics Dissertation Prize for his analysis of the antiquark data from that experiment. Measurements at CERN and Fermilab during the subsequent two decades have consistently found more down antiquarks in the proton than up antiquarks.
“Because there is this surprise — an asymmetry in the abundance of these two flavors — we thought there might also be a surprise in their role in spin,” Drachenberg said.
Indeed, earlier results from RHIC indicated there might be a difference in how the two flavors contribute to spin, encouraging the STAR team to do more experiments.
Delivering on spin goals
The STAR collaboration’s most recent result represents the accumulation of data from the 20-year RHIC spin program. It is the final result from one of the two initial pillars of the RHIC spin program, the other being gluon spin measurements.
For all of these experiments, STAR analyzed the results of polarized proton collisions at RHIC — collisions where the overall spin direction of RHIC’s two beams of protons was aligned in particular ways. Looking for differences in the number of certain particles produced when the spin direction of one polarized proton beam is flipped can be used to track the spin alignment of various constituents — and therefore their contributions to overall proton spin.
For the sea quark measurements, STAR physicists counted electrons and positrons — antimatter versions of electrons that are the same in every way except that they carry a positive rather than a negative electric charge. The electrons and positrons come from the decay of particles called W bosons, which also come in negative and positive varieties. The difference in the number of electrons produced when the colliding proton’s spin direction is flipped indicates a difference in W- production and serves as a stand in for measuring the spin alignment of the up antiquarks. Similarly, the difference in positrons comes from a difference in W+ production and serves the stand-in role for measuring the spin contribution of down antiquarks.
The data show definitively, for the first time, that the spins of up antiquarks make a greater contribution to overall proton spin than the spins of down antiquarks.
“This ‘flavor asymmetry,’ as scientists call it, is surprising in itself, but even more so considering there are more down antiquarks than up antiquarks,” said Qinghua Xu of Shandong University, who supervised one of the graduate students (Jinlong Zhang) whose analysis was essential to the paper.
As Sichtermann noted, “This discrepancy indicates the complexity of the interactions among these particles, which will have to be taken into account in any model seeking to understand this mysterious sea that you have inside the proton.
“If you go back to the original proton spin puzzle, where we learned that the sum of the quark and antiquark spins accounts for just a fraction of proton spin, the next questions are, what is the gluon contribution? What is the contribution from the orbital motion of the quarks and gluons? But also, why is the quark contribution so small? Is it because of a cancellation between quark and antiquark spin contributions? Or is it because of differences between different quark flavors? Previous RHIC results have shown that gluons play a significant role in the proton spin. This new analysis gives a clear indication that the sea also plays a significant role. It is far more complicated than just gluons splitting into any flavor you like — and a very good reason to look deeper into the sea.”
Additional STAR measurements might offer insight into the spin contributions of exotic quark/antiquark pairs. In addition, scientists hope to delve deeper into the spin mystery with a proposed future machine, the Electron-Ion Collider. This particle accelerator would use electrons to directly probe the spin structure of the internal components of a proton and should ultimately solve the proton spin puzzle.
# # # # # # # # # #
About Brookhaven National Laboratory: Brookhaven National Laboratory is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy. The Office of Science is the single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States and is working to address some of the most pressing challenges of our time. For more information, please visit https://www.energy.gov/science/office-science.
About Research at Texas A&M University: As one of the world’s leading research institutions, Texas A&M is at the forefront in making significant contributions to scholarship and discovery, including that of science and technology. Research conducted at Texas A&M represented annual expenditures of more than $922 million in fiscal year 2018. Texas A&M ranked in the top 20 of the National Science Foundation’s Higher Education Research and Development survey (2017), based on expenditures of more than $905.4 million in fiscal year 2017. Texas A&M’s research creates new knowledge that provides basic, fundamental and applied contributions resulting, in many cases, in economic benefits to the state, nation and world. To learn more, visit http://research.tamu.edu/.